|
Death Tunnel (2005)
IMDB rating: 2.70
Plot: Movie is based on the True Stories and Hauntings of Waverly Hills Sanatorium in Louisville, Kentucky. This horrific Five story structure is listed as one of the Top Ten Scariest Places on Earth, due to the 63,000+ deaths within this monument of Terror. They were then carried through the massive Five hundred foot underground Tunnel to their final resting place. The story involves Five girls on a college initiation, dared to spend the night separately on the Five floors of this sanatorium, with the Five ghosts that exist within it’s abandoned corridors. Will they make it through the night? For the only way out is through…the Death Tunnel.
|
this movie i download here and download Death Tunnel
Directors: Booth Philip Adrian
Actors: Lasater Jason,Wolf Gary,Gayle Gill,Dyer Brian,Ghai Jilon,Bernstein Jesse,Harr Jr. George W.,Winslow B.J.,Horror,
What would you consider to be the most important factor that made US forces withdraw from vietnam in 1973?
choose out of these:
oppostion to the war
death rates
growth of antiwar feeling
inexperience of the troops
the tunnel system
cost of war
My Lai Massacre or
the chinese and soviet support
chose one and explain why
Personally without choosing one of them I would say ‘because they where getting their a-holes kicked’ ^_^.
But if I had too chose one from the list i’d choose the tunnel system.
Pretty hard to fight against geurilla warfare ^_^.
Liam | Jan 08, 2010
Basically we were getting fucked in the ass
iswallow69 | Jan 08, 2010
The fact that they were fighting a losing battle.
I fink | Jan 08, 2010
As an "outsider"…the British were against the war anyway (the people).There were many protests and rallies throughout the war,even I went to a big meeting where everything was debated.The outsiders view was that the USA basically "lost".I remember General Westmoreland saying he was basically going to bomb the VC into submission…he didn’t.Following Korea perhaps some of the self-confidence was gone.
Incidentally,I love Tom Paxton and "Talking Vietnam Pot Blues" !
Prof | Jan 08, 2010
Cost of the war combined with antiwar feeling, which had gone from college students and left wing types to everyday people, Senators, Congressmen and middle aged World War II era veterans, etc.
Rubym | Jan 08, 2010
We were not fighting a losing battle and if the RVNs had used standard tactics, we would have beaten them eons before 1975. Television did a lot by building up opposition to the war. The war could have been better fought had the government really allowed the generals to do the warring.
Death rates might have been a factor, but we lost 54000 troops killed and a zillion and one either physically or mentally wounded for life. A bit problem with body counts was Westmoreland’s publishing the number of VC and RVN that were killed every day. Had his numbers been anywhere near the truth, we would have killed everyone East of Washington, DC.
Inexperience of the troops is something that has to be dealt with in any war. If you study D Day 1944, the first troops sent ashore had no battle experience, they were just cannon fodder.
The tunner system was a hinderance, but we knew about it going in since we replaced the French in that war and they were defeated by general Giap when he dug underthem and attacked them from the rear.
My Lai was just one of those things. The Blackwater killings in Bagdhad were about as bad and that has not stopped the war in Iraq.
Chinese and Soviet support - that was to be expected. You have to remember that we were not in that war alone, we had allies in Australia and Korea, both of which sent a number of troops, and the Koreans were, perhaps, the most fierce fighters in the war.
I spent ten days in a hospital in Cam Ranh Bay in a bed next to a Korean ROK (Republic of Korea) soldier who had to have a kidney removed. All he did all day and night was to scream that he would now not be able to kill again since they were putting him out of the army.,
Polyhistor | Jan 08, 2010
public opinion, after state troupers shot dead four unarmed students at kent university ohio, in 1970 who were demonstrating against the US occupation of cambodia, this was on the direct instructions of the vice president, via the state governor who ordered "kill the hippy bastards", not exactly their finest hour, but they do try to cover it up nowadays, however the daughter of a professor, who witnessed these murders, still preserves a website with full details in their memory.
Mick W | Jan 08, 2010
I do not accept your options. the us won the war in vietnam . the us war objective was a capitalist vietnam, when the us withdrew the Vietnamese were free to choose their own system and now vietnam is a capitalist country. Perhaps the US should learn from their experience and leave Afghanistan for the people there to choose - its called democracy - a new idea perhaps, they should practise what they preach and instead of imposing regimes let the local people choose. the solution to Afghanistan lies in Israel. I am not a muslim, jew or Communist - just a democrat
Roger P | Jan 08, 2010
Opposition to the war - When Walter Cronkite said to the American people on the CBS news that there was no way to convince the American people we had a chance of winning in Vietnam the opposition to the war grew, and nothing could stop it. We had the military manpower and hardware to win the war, but the people didn’t want to see there loved ones sacrificed for no good reason. No one could convince the American people if we didn’t win the North Vietnamese would invade our country and take us over. In WWII that was the reason we fought a two ocean war, and with the help of our allies the Germans and Japanese were stopped in their quest for world domination.
tuffy | Jan 08, 2010
The Vietcong were better soldiers.
brainstorm | Jan 09, 2010
Growth of anti war feeling in USA.
This was causing serious divisions and social unrest in American society, which Nixon wanted to end.The only way to do this quickly was to pull out,ending American involvement.
ammianus | Jan 09, 2010
Anti-war feeling. The Tet Offensive in 1968 turned many supporters of the war agaisnt it, not just those who thought the war was wrong but those who supported it to ebgin with. Simply because the US seemed to spending money loosing lives and getting nothing out of it, much how many British feel about afganistan.
Juzt | Jan 09, 2010
we were losing.
james | Jan 09, 2010
